231 Law

Why you should Consider Hiring an Attorney after an Accident

Accidents happen, and they happen more frequently than you’d think. If you are involved in an accident and end up sustaining injuries or damages due to someone else’s carelessness or negligence, then you should file an accident claim and have the responsible party pay you for the damages. However, getting compensation is sometimes not as easy as submitting a claim or negotiating with the insurance company. It can quickly get complicated when the other driver’s insurance company wants to compensate you unfairly for your injuries and damages or refuses to pay you altogether, claiming that you were at fault. Due to your lack of knowledge and experience dealing with such cases (an accident is not something that happens to you every day), it’s easier to feel frustrated and end up giving up.

Working with an Indiana car accident attorney is your best shot at getting compensation for your damages. They are seasoned by experience and have an incredible understanding of everything that goes into such claims. They will help lift the burden off your shoulders, and ensure you get the best possible results for your lawsuit.

So, why should you consider hiring an attorney after an accident? Read on to find out.

They are well versed with the law and procedural rules

Hiring a competent accident lawyer means having professional representation, and is what you need to navigate through the case effortlessly. Top lawyers often are well informed about the relevant laws as well as the procedural rules that may influence your case. In addition to helping you gather the right kind of evidence to build your case, the lawyer will also inform you about the statute of limitation, file a claim on your behalf and if needs be, mitigate any defenses brought against you. Most importantly, your accident attorney …

The difference between theft, burglary, and robbery in Massachusetts

In the criminal justice world, the terms burglary, theft, and robbery mean different things and carry different penalties, depending on the crime you are charged with. Here is how to differentiate the three in Massachusetts:

Theft

According to Massachusetts criminal law, you are committing larceny or theft if you acquire property without the owner’s authorization; if you acquire property through threat or deceit; or if you consciously handle stolen property. The defendant must have, however, had the intent to permanently take the property from the owner for it to be considered a theft. This means that if your neighbor had a go on your bike without your consent and later returned it, the act will not be considered a theft.

Consider hiring a property crimes lawyer to review your theft case and help you understand your charges before the trial begins. If you are the victim, ensure you have an attorney by your side right from the beginning to ensure you present a strong case before the jury.

Theft crimes carry a vast spectrum of penalties and sentencing is largely dependent on the manner of the theft and the value of the stolen property. If the value of the property is less than $250 and was not stolen directly from another person, you will likely face a Class A misdemeanor charge. If the property was directly stolen from another person, the theft is considered a Class 3 felony.

Robbery

Robbery occurs when someone uses threat or force to take someone else’s property. Aggravated robbery, on the other hand, is when the robber indicates to the person they are stealing from that they have a dangerous weapon such as a firearm with them, whether or not they eventually use it.

The potential punishments for robberies are significantly more severe than thefts …

Types of Criminal Defenses Used in Criminal Trials

If you’ve been accused of any crime, expect to appear in court. In this situation, the accused is referred to as the defendant. Working with the defendant, an Orlando criminal defense lawyer will want to build criminal defense to ensure a guilty verdict doesn’t arise.

A criminal defense refers to a strategic argument aimed at challenging the sufficiency and validity of the prosecution’s evidence. In this case, the prosecution refers to the party attempting to prove you’re guilty of a certain crime.

Affirmative criminal defense

Certain criminal defenses may try to undo the prosecution’s evidence by proving it’s false. On the other hand, some defenses can accept part of the prosecution’s evidence to be true. Such defenses are commonly known as affirmative defenses. These defenses require the defendant together with their criminal attorney, to come up with evidence that supports the defense.

For instance, if you’re facing first-degree murder charges, you and your lawyer can decide to come up with an alibi witness-someone to testify that you couldn’t have committed the crime you’re being accused of. In this case, the alibi witness is the defense.

Coercion and duress

It’s an affirmative criminal defense, which says you were forced into committing a crime after an unlawful force was used to threaten you. The unlawful force itself doesn’t necessarily have to occur; the threat of the unlawful force could be sufficient to prove a coercion defense.

Also, the accused doesn’t have to experience the threat of force directly. It could have been directed towards another person, such as the accused’s family member.

Abandonment and withdrawal

Also referred to us renunciation, abandonment and withdrawal, is another criminal defense type available to defendants. The defense often says that you were to be their accomplice or commit a certain crime, but you decided not to …